What’s the Best Microphone for Screencasting?
December 2nd, 2009 | Posted in blog 25 Comments »
The other week I visited Performance Audio in downtown Salt Lake to see what recommendations they had for microphones. The clerk asked me what audio interface I was using. I said I was just plugging my mixer directly into the computer. He looked shocked and said no matter how good of a microphone I bought, the real increase in performance would come with an audio interface.
The Audio Interface
An audio interface converts the analog signal to a digital signal. It turns out that rather than buying a fancy audio interface for $150+, I could just use my Zoom H4 as an audio interface between the mixer and the computer. Here’s what that setup looks like:
That’s a Shure SM58 microphone plugged in to a Behringer Xenyx 802 mixer. The mixer plugs into the ZoomH4, which connects to the laptop through a USB cable.
Listen to the difference:
Without the audio interface
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
With the audio interface:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The audio interface example has some more clarity and crispness to the voice. It’s more apparent with gaps of silence — listen to the static background at the start of the sample in the first version compared with the complete absence of any static background in the second example. The Zoom H4 is really quite a cool solution for an audio interface. Just switch it to Audio I/O mode and voila, it converts the analog signal from the mixer to a clearer, digital one.
Inexpensive Mics
Sometimes it helps to hear contrasts in order to evaluate sounds. If you’re on a tight budget, you could just use an inexpensive Plantronics headset, like this:
And this is what it sounds like:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Here’s a Logitech USB headset. It sounds even worse:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Here’s a dynamic omnidirectional lapel mic attached to my collar as I record:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Yikes.
Why the Mixer?
If I take the mixer out of the equation, the audio still sounds good. Here’s an example with just the Shure mic connected the H4, and then to the laptop (with no mixer):
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Not bad. If it sounds pretty good, why add the mixer? The mixer allows you to adjust the low, mid, and high frequencies of your voice. So you have more control over how your voice sounds.
You can also increase the level of the voice with a mixer. I find that if I just use the Zoom H4 with a mic, the level is unacceptably low unless I’m speaking directly into the mic in a close, focused way. In that last recording, I cranked up the sound level to the max just so it would sound normal.
You can also record directly into the Zoom H4′s built-in mics (what look like a taser) without connecting an external microphone. When you do that, here’s what it sounds like:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Can you hear the difference in sound? The built-in microphone with the Zoom H4 is a condenser mic, which is a higher quality, more sensitive microphone than the Shure SM58′s dynamic mic. Most high quality studio mics are condenser mics rather than dynamic mics (the physics is vastly different, but not worth explaining).
The condenser mics, however, tend to pick up more mouth noises (breathing, swallowing, opening or closing your mouth, etc), so it’s a little trickier to record well. Recording 101 is to get your mouth close to the microphone, but when you get close, you also get the unwanted mouth sounds.
Speaking of getting close to a mic, one cool benefit of the Shure SM58 mic is its ability to amplify the base frequencies of your voice when you get close. Here’s a sample of how that sounds:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
I’m not sure I would want to listen to a ton of video tutorials in a late-night-DJ type voice, so I usually don’t get that close, but it’s nice to know the effect is there if I want it.
Acoustic Environments
I’ve been toying with the idea of better acoustics, so I created a cardboard box lined with old eggcrate foam that some friends left in our basement. This is what it looks like:
It doubles as a sleeping mattress if you’re homeless. Just add some newspaper on top and you’re all set. By the way, if you think carrying this around an IT department is cool, you’ve probably spent too much time in your basement.
The eggcrate foam isn’t really acoustic dampening foam, so its effect is negligible. I’d probably be better with some blankets draped around.
Here’s how the mic sounds without the foam wall:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
And with the foam wall:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Not much difference.
Instead of the egg crate foam, I’m thinking of going for a Reflexion Shield like this:
Much cooler. By the way, this wall is actually smaller than it looks. It’s about the size of two and a half computer monitors. They cost $300 and require a mic base stand to keep them propped up.
Plosives, Pop Filters, and Windscreens
Can you identify what’s attached to the mic in the following photo?
It’s pantyhose stretched across a bent coat hanger. Classy, I know. That’s apparently how to make a homemade pop filter. Pop filters cut down on plosives. Removing plosives can make a dramatic difference in the quality of your recording.
To understand plosives, put your hand in front of your mouth and say “penguins puffing on the patio.” Lots of puffs of air hit your hand. Now put your coat sleeve in front of your mouth (or, if you’re wearing pantyhose …), and try again. The puffs of air are gone.
Puffs of air aren’t a big deal in everyday conversation, but microphones register puffs of air like giant gusts, or like a truck releasing its hydralic brakes. The sound waves jump to the top of the range. It’s hard on the ears.
Apparently windscreens (foam covers for mics) are meant to reduce wind noises when you’re outdoors, or to protect your mic from germs when you pass it around. But in my experiment, the windscreen cuts down the plosives just as well as the pop filter.
Here’s the sound without any windscreen or pop filter:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Can you hear the plosives? I picked a sentence that is packed with them, so they will be more apparent.
Here’s the sound with a windscreen:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Here’s the sound with the pop filter:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Could you really tell the difference?
As a bonus, the windscreen makes the mic look a lot cooler than it does with stretched pantyhose.
What Really Matters
I was talking with my colleague Mike today, a former DJ, about tips and tricks with sound. He explained that adding an element of music takes some of the focus off the voice. He also recommended that if I add music, I should pan the music a little to the right and the voice a little to the left so the sound isn’t competing for the same space.
But, he added, although as a DJ he often did little tricks here and there to increase the quality of the sound, he found that people didn’t notice and … just danced.
And that’s really what it comes down to. Not the little tricks and tweaks of the voice, but the ability to create an interesting, conversational voice in spite of insipid instructional material that you may be reading.
Sponsors
Tags: Podcasting, Screencasting
If you liked this post, keep updated with new content: Subscribe to I'd Rather Be Writing.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
























Tom,
Great comparison of the different mics. I like how you had all your different MP3 files loaded in your site. I didn’t get that in the RSS feed so I came right over to listen!
I too put together a comparison of different audio inputs used for screencasting over at http://macscreencasting.com/audio-and-microphone-comparison-for-screencasting.html Some listeners may find that useful too.
I’m no audiophile. What I preferred, others may not. It’s personal preferences. But, you summed it up nicely at the end…
It’s the CONTENT!
Scott, thanks for creating the screencast. I think I watched that when you first launched your site; I just rewatched it. You do a nice job with your screencasts — I really like the personal element at the beginning and end. That’s something I want to do. I also like your download link because my bandwidth isn’t so hot here.
One question I have is about your site’s title — mac screencasting. Is screencasting on a mac so different from screencasting on another platform? Or will your screencasts eventually focus on macs? I wasn’t sure. I know Don McAllister at http://screencastsonline.com does screencasts all about macs.
Tom,
Thanks for the compliment on the screencasts. I do try to bring in the human element, I think it’s an important step in creating rapport with your viewers.
MacScreencasting isn’t like Don’s site where he does Mac software demos. My site focuses on creating screencasts on Macs. What I found was there are lots of sites that talk about creating screencasts. However, most are Camtasia focused. I wanted to create a site that focused on the Mac tools and more importantly, a site that focused on combining several Mac tools together to create screencasts.
That’s why you’ll see me combine screencasting software with Apple’s Keynote & iMovie.
Nice stuff Tom. The mic we use (and love) is the Smason C03U. It’s USB condenser mic that really does a great job. Amen to pop-filters and make-shift-egg-crate sound booths too.
And by smason, I actually mean Samson C03U…
Chris, thanks for adding your recommendation on mics in here. I’ve heard good things about Samson’s USB mics. They definitely simplify the recording process.
Thanks for the detailed info! I want to improve the audio on my Excel tutorial videos, and didn’t realize that so much happened between the mic and the computer.
Tom, this post couldn’t have been more timely; I’m engaged right now in recording voice over for some product tutorials and I’ve been using a laptop and inexpensive headphone/mic setup.
Thanks for the great tips. Can’t wait to try some of them out.
Thanks Patty. I’m planning to write a follow-up post about more inexpensive mics, so stay tuned.
Excellent, low-cost ways to make the most of affordable gear. Great post!
Thanks Dave.
I tend to use large-diaphragm condensor mics, like the Samson that Chris mentioned. But I also don’t mind doing post-production work to clean up extra noises and sweeten the sound – in fact, I think it’s essential for getting a really polished end product (for professional tutorials that need to make a good impression).
I thought the Zoom mics by themselves sounded great. I’d lean toward that simple setup with more post. But I guess I’m an editor at heart – just give me decent content and let me polish it afterward.
Thanks for your tips on the mics you use, Harry. I agree that post-processing is key to getting good sound. I don’t know if I ever mentioned it, but I bought Soundsoap about a year and a half ago when you recommended it. Soundsoap has been helpful in cleaning up static background noises.
Great post. I’ve been looking for cheap mics but couldn’t decide which one to pick. Your post really helped !
Glad to help.
Terrific post, Tom. Thanks.
Thanks Joe.
[...] not going to go into that here. My friend Tom Johnson has written a couple of excellent blog posts on this subject. And Tom has made some good example screencasts available. [...]
Tom, this post is singular! I looked for something like this 6 months ago when I wanted to compare podcasting microphones and recording techniques but I couldn’t find anything as comprehensive as this. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks Mike. I appreciate your help and input with the mixer especially — I would have been lost without you.
Love the work in this article. Setup my entire studio based on your experiments and information. Thanks so very much for sharing your experience. I bought the Q3 Zoom instead of the H4N because I want to video as well.
Thanks again.
JBII
John, I’m really curious about the Q3 Zoom. I’d never heard of it until you posted your comment. Now I just watched the videos and am intrigued. Can you post a demo audio/video recording of it sometime?
Stunning and informative post. What software that can record the sound that my computer produces? – Not using a microphone? Can you help me in this.
In my chessjam screencast, I recorded the game’s sounds by plugging a connector from the headphones jack of my computer to a 1/8th inch port on my mixer. It worked. You my have to go to an electronics store for this type of cable.
You could probably find another solution to record the music your computer hears, because no doubt people do this all the time with Pandora.
THAT is why you were carrying around the eggcrate. I thought Jane had kicked you out of the house.
I’m actually getting started on doing some screencasts for my project, and came across your blog entry as I was searching for info on creating good screencasts.
Do you want to do my screencasts for me? Or can I borrow your hardware?
[MARKED AS SPAM BY ANTISPAM BEE | CSS Hack]
I have seen loads of useful points on your website about pc’s. However, I have got the view that laptops are still not nearly powerful enough to be a wise decision if you frequently do jobs that require lots of power, for example video editing and enhancing. But for website surfing, statement processing, and many other popular computer functions they are okay, provided you don’t mind the screen size. Appreciate sharing your ideas.