Adding inflection (Voiceover)

If you don’t want to sound as if you’re reading copy (if you want to instead sound as if you’re speaking conversationally to the user), consider using more inflection. Inflection is a change in the pitch in your voice, moving up or down the scale as you talk.

Lack of inflection pretty much defines the reading voice. If you read a paragraph of text in a normal reading voice, you won’t hear much inflection. But if you listen to a real conversation, or especially if you listen to actors on TV, their voices move up and down the scale with a lot more inflection. It seems the more emotion you add to what you’re saying, the more inflection you end up including.

According to Old School, inflection is key to keeping the attention of your audience:

If you know anyone whose voice never rises or falls, who drones on and on in the same monotone, you know how soon you lose interest in what he is saying. The voice that holds your attention conveys emotion and interest by change of pitch or inflection. Old and Sold

One reason inflection keeps the audience’s attention is because inflection communicates emotional investment in what you’re saying. When you believe in the content and it matters to you, your words become emotionally invested and inflection naturally follows.

When I listen to Robert Segul on NPR, I can hear the inflection in his voice. Part of the problem with inflection, though, is that you can’t just start inflecting and assume it will make your voice more believable. If you inflect in an unnatural way, the result is corniness. It’s easy to fall into an annoying emphatic rhythm, or to overdo inflection to the point that it draws attention to itself.

An unnatural inflection is almost worse than lack of inflection. You’ve seen the equivalent in text when someone can’t stop writing with ALL KINDS of emphasis that, well, you just find …. S-U-P-E-R ANNOYING. You have to inflect in a believable way.

Exactly how you inflect in a believable way is an art. When you’re closing a thought, your inflection goes down. When you’re raising a question, your inflection goes up. Dan Levine recommends that you start reading about in the middle of your pitch, so that you have room to inflect. If you start too low, you can’t go lower on the scale, so you’re stuck.

You can also twist a word here and there to break out of a reading rhythm. You’d be amazed at how you can pick — almost at random — any word in a sentence and twist it to free yourself from a monotone reading rhythm.

As you focus on inflection, listen as you talk. Make note of how you change your voice, how you pause and move up and down the scale. Listen to the inflection in other people’s voices as they talk. As you start to focus on inflection, you’ll begin to hear what is believable. It’s something we unconsciously ignore.

One note. I know plenty of people who speak in a flat, monotone voice as their normal pitch and inflection. If that’s the case (and it’s partly the case with me), consider opening your mouth and getting into what you’re saying a little bit more. You might have to get creative and imagine yourself in a situation. For example, rather than imagining yourself talking to a user about the calendar feature of your app, which might bore you and leave your delivery flat, imagine yourself in a courtroom before a jury, or something similar.

follow us in feedly

Adobe RobohelpMadcap Flare

This entry was posted in screencasting on by .

By Tom Johnson

I'm a technical writer working for a gamification company called Badgeville in the Silicon Valley area in California. I'm primarily interested in topics related to technical writing, such as visual communication (video tutorials, illustrations), findability (organization, information architecture), content development (DITA, testing), API documentation (code examples, programming), web publishing (web platforms, Web design) -- pretty much everything related to technical writing. If you're trying to keep up to date about the field of technical communication, subscribe to my blog either by RSS or by email. To learn more about me, see my About page. You can also contact me if you have questions.

3 thoughts on “Adding inflection (Voiceover)

  1. Alistair Christie

    “An unnatural inflection is almost worse than lack of inflection.”

    I know what you mean but I think it’s best to err on the side of exaggerated inflection. I went on one of those presentation skills courses years ago where everyone has to do a little presentation, they video it and then you have to watch it back. What was immediately obvious – and was the one common feature of the feedback I got – was that I was droning on in a monotone. No matter how interesting the content of what I was saying may have been, nobody was ever going to find it interesting as long as I kept droning on in a lifeless monotone. One of the reasons I started podcasting was to try to train myself out of the habit of speaking in a monotone but even now, years later, I still have to deliberately speak in a bit of a “radio voice” to try and prolong the listeners’ attention span.

    “Exactly how you inflect in a believable way is an art.”

    Definitely! You need to learn to listen to yourself, which, for most of us, involves the first step of getting past the cringe factor when you hear yourself back.

    My advice (for what it’s worth) would be: don’t be afraid to ham it up, just a little!

    1. Tom Johnson

      You’re totally right on this. I think I will emphasize this more in a later revision of this series. The paradox here is that I’m trying to explain how to achieve a personal, natural voice. Somewhere along the way I realized that I really wanted a personal, professional voice. My voice in natural conversation just isn’t that exciting.

Comments are closed.