<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I&#039;d Rather Be Writing &#187; Char James-Tanney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idratherbewriting.com/tag/char-james-tanney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idratherbewriting.com</link>
	<description>The Latest Trends in Technical Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Prove My Help Authoring Tools Survey Wrong</title>
		<link>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/09/10/prove-my-help-authoring-tools-survey-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/09/10/prove-my-help-authoring-tools-survey-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Char James-Tanney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAT-Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help authoring tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/?p=1957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Help Authoring Tools survey in my blog&#8217;s sidebar has been the source of no little controversy, and I&#8217;ve left it up there for a reason. I&#8217;ve been telling myself that when 1,000 people participate, I&#8217;ll officially analyze the results. (So far 784 have voted.) However, Char James-Tanny announced a new help authoring tools survey, this one sponsored by the HAT-Matrix (not to be confused ... <a href="http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/09/10/prove-my-help-authoring-tools-survey-wrong/">more &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Help Authoring Tools survey in my blog&#8217;s sidebar has been the source of no little controversy, and I&#8217;ve left it up there for a reason. I&#8217;ve been telling myself that when 1,000 people participate, I&#8217;ll officially analyze the results. (So far 784 have voted.)</p>
<p>However, <a href="http://helpstuff.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/08/authoring_tool_survey_now_posted" target="_blank">Char James-Tanny announced</a> a new help authoring tools survey, this one sponsored by the <a href="http://hat-matrix.com/" target="_blank">HAT-Matrix</a> (not to be confused with the Matrix movie). The new HAT-Matrix&#8217;s survey is a little more official looking. Perhaps the creators have taken into account all of the slippery variables that lead to survey bias.</p>
<p>So I ask you to please take a minute and <a href="http://is.gd/2mx8" target="_blank">fill out the help authoring tools survey</a> published by the HAT-Matrix. I&#8217;m really curious to know if the survey in my blog&#8217;s sidebar is bogus or if it carries any weight. The HAT-Matrix&#8217;s help authoring tools survey will be available until the end of September 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/09/10/prove-my-help-authoring-tools-survey-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

