<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I&#039;d Rather Be Writing &#187; Sarah Lacey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idratherbewriting.com/tag/sarah-lacey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idratherbewriting.com</link>
	<description>The Latest Trends in Technical Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Uncooperative Subjects: A Comparison of Two Failed Interviews and How to Turn Them Around</title>
		<link>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/03/14/which-interview-is-worse-luke-burbanks-sigur-ros-interview-or-sarah-laceys-zuckerburg-inteview/</link>
		<comments>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/03/14/which-interview-is-worse-luke-burbanks-sigur-ros-interview-or-sarah-laceys-zuckerburg-inteview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Lacey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screencasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigur Ros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2008/03/14/which-interview-is-worse-luke-burbanks-sigur-ros-interview-or-sarah-laceys-zuckerburg-inteview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched a couple of interviews this week that spiraled downhill. The first is a Luke Burbank interview with the Icelandic band Sigur Ros. The second is a Sarah Lacy SXSW interview with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Sigur Ros Interview With the Sigur Ros, the interviewees have little to say. Despite Luke&#8217;s continual questions, their responses are terse, uninsightful, and often consist of 1-3 word ... <a href="http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/03/14/which-interview-is-worse-luke-burbanks-sigur-ros-interview-or-sarah-laceys-zuckerburg-inteview/">more &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched a couple of interviews this week that spiraled downhill. The first is a Luke Burbank <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/2007/10/when_good_interviews_go_bad.html">interview with the Icelandic band Sigur Ros.</a> The second is a Sarah Lacy <a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/03/mark-zuckerberg-sarah-lacy-interview-video/">SXSW interview with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.</a></p>
<h3><span id="more-1411"></span>Sigur Ros Interview</h3>
<p>With the Sigur Ros, the interviewees <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/2007/10/when_good_interviews_go_bad.html">have little to say</a>. Despite Luke&#8217;s continual questions, their responses are terse, uninsightful, and often consist of 1-3 word answers.  Luke recognizes that the interview is bombing, but he doesn&#8217;t quite know how to fix it, and the interviewees don&#8217;t ever open up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s partly the band&#8217;s fault for their unresponsiveness, but it&#8217;s also Luke&#8217;s fault for asking questions that don&#8217;t elicit good responses. Questions like, How do you write your songs? How do you feel being a phenomenon? And so on.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that the interview is a complete failure, but Luke makes an <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/2007/10/anatomy_of_an_interview_gone_w.html">ingenious comeback with a follow-up commentary</a>, where he invites <a href="http://janceedunn.typepad.com/">Jancee Dunn</a> to give a play-by-play analysis on the wreckage. I absolutely loved watching this. It shows Luke&#8217;s humility and humanity &#8212; and endears his audience back to him.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/2007/10/anatomy_of_an_interview_gone_w.html"><img src="http://www.idratherbewriting.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/brilliantrecovery.png" alt="brilliantrecovery.png" /></a></p>
<h3>Zuckerberg Interview</h3>
<p>With the <a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/03/mark-zuckerberg-sarah-lacy-interview-video/">Mark Zuckerberg interview</a>, Sarah Lacy gets Zuckerberg to open up quite a bit (apparently he&#8217;s a little like the Sigur Ros band &#8212; shy and untalkative). But near the end of the interview, the audience revolts and insults Sarah&#8217;s interviewing style, which makes her defensive, a little confused, and stunned.</p>
<p>If you watch the Zuckerberg interview, it doesn&#8217;t seem too bad. Sarah is relaxed and playful, even teasing the Mark a little, telling stories and making jokes about throwing water on him. But for some reason, much of the audience hates her style. They want her to be a lot more invisible, shining the spotlight more on Mark.</p>
<p>The interesting parts are from minutes 49 to the end. Also, if you listen to <a href="http://audio.sxsw.com/podcast/interactive/panels/2008/SXSW08.INT.20080309.ZuckerbergKeynote.mp3">the MP3 recording</a>, you can hear Sarah&#8217;s reaction while the audience cheers for her to simply shut up and ask questions.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/03/mark-zuckerberg-sarah-lacy-interview-video/" title="Sarah Lacy interview with Mark Zuckerberg"><img src="http://www.idratherbewriting.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/sarah.png" alt="Sarah Lacy interview with Mark Zuckerberg" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/03/mark-zuckerberg-sarah-lacy-interview-video/#comment-8064">Weave&#8217;s comment</a> on the video best sums up the audience&#8217;s discontent. He says there are 5 things to learn from this failed interview:</p>
<blockquote><p>1) Understand your audience, regardless of what you think of them. If you have contempt for them, keep it veiled. This group: pretty vocal.</p>
<p>2) Ask questions, step aside and allow your speaker to engage directly with the audience…even if the speaker is not the most practiced. “Mmm-hmms” and interruptions are unnecessary and detract from what the audience wants to hear.</p>
<p>3) Remember who the audience is there to see. Leave your own book, TV show, etc., out of the conversation. It wasn’t a panel, it was a keynote.</p>
<p>4) If the audience isn’t as professional or mature as you’d like them to be, don’t be unprofessional or immature back to them.</p>
<p>5) Twirling the hair, jokingly threatening to throw water at the keynote, belittling/laughing at the keynote, yelling to someone else in the back for clarification, saying “screw all you guys” to your audience: COMPLETELY UNPROFESSIONAL AND UNBUSINESSWEEK.</p></blockquote>
<p>But unlike Luke, Sarah is unrepentant. She doesn&#8217;t acknowledge the interview&#8217;s failure. She doesn&#8217;t ask someone to step her through it play by play to learn where she went wrong.</p>
<h3>My Analysis</h3>
<p>In both interviews, the interviewer faced uncooperative people. With Luke, the interviewees themselves were uncooperative. They didn&#8217;t want to open up. With Sarah, her interviewee was cooperative, but her audience was not. Rather than play along, they mutinied against her in a &#8220;Digg-style mob revolt,&#8221; as she says.</p>
<p>So what do you do when you&#8217;re interviewing someone and you realize something is going wrong?  In the moment, when you realize something&#8217;s not working, that something isn&#8217;t right, you&#8217;re filled with stress and paralyzing confusion. You know you should change course and move in a different direction, but you&#8217;re flooded with emotions and you have to continue saying something.</p>
<p>While your reaction may be defensiveness or anger, or sarcasm, the best response is to be humble and honest. Admit vocally that something isn&#8217;t going right. Luke could have candidly asked the band why they weren&#8217;t responding to his questions. When Sarah sensed her audience was turning against her, she could have asked them &#8212; in a humble way &#8212; what she was doing wrong.</p>
<p>After admitting things aren&#8217;t going right, Jancee&#8217;s advice seems the best strategy for getting things back on track. She says to memorize 10 emergency questions you can ask any time you&#8217;re in danger. For example, one question of her questions is, &#8220;What was the name of the first band you were in?&#8221; This helps people start telling stories about themselves.</p>
<p>In Sarah&#8217;s situation, she could have simply said to her audience, &#8220;What questions would you like to ask Mark?&#8221; and then turned it over to them. She eventually did this, but not before saying a few things that turned her audience even more against her.</p>
<p>As I prepare for some upcoming conferences, I know I&#8217;ll be interviewing people on the spot, without much preparation beforehand. At the last STC conference, I usually ran out of conversation topics after 5-7 minutes. This year I will work on memorizing some emergency questions that will elicit more personal stories. And if I sense something isn&#8217;t going right, I&#8217;ll try to humble confront the reasons why.</p>
<h3>Music Note</h3>
<p>While writing this post, I&#8217;ve been listening and re-listening and re-re-listening to the three Sigur Ros songs Luke posted in the original NPR article:</p>
<blockquote><p> Their <a href="http://www.hivenet.is/befb/sigur_ros-untitled4.mp3">music</a> is <a href="http://download.sigur-ros.co.uk/sigur_ros-steindor-fjoll.mp3">beautiful</a> and <a href="http://bjornfloki.vortex.is/sigur_ros-olsenolsen.mp3">moving</a>, so much so that it doesn&#8217;t matter that they&#8217;re singing in a totally made-up language.</p></blockquote>
<p>Click the links to listen to their music. They really are good. Especially that first song/link (<em>desire? e-sire?</em>). This post is going on an hour now and I just keep listening to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/03/14/which-interview-is-worse-luke-burbanks-sigur-ros-interview-or-sarah-laceys-zuckerburg-inteview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://audio.sxsw.com/podcast/interactive/panels/2008/SXSW08.INT.20080309.ZuckerbergKeynote.mp3" length="30082944" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.hivenet.is/befb/sigur_ros-untitled4.mp3" length="8346855" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://bjornfloki.vortex.is/sigur_ros-olsenolsen.mp3" length="9025623" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://download.sigur-ros.co.uk/sigur_ros-steindor-fjoll.mp3" length="6574208" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

