<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I&#039;d Rather Be Writing &#187; topic titles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idratherbewriting.com/tag/topic-titles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idratherbewriting.com</link>
	<description>The Latest Trends in Technical Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are Gerunds in Topic Titles Problematic in Search Results?</title>
		<link>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/02/11/are-gerunds-in-topic-titles-problematic-in-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/02/11/are-gerunds-in-topic-titles-problematic-in-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topic titles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2008/02/11/are-gerunds-in-topic-titles-problematic-in-search-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been accustomed to writing topic titles as gerunds (for example, &#8220;Configuring the Monitor Display&#8221; or &#8220;Reformatting Your Hard Drive&#8221;), followed by specific steps that would begin, &#8220;To configure the monitor display&#8230;,&#8221; or &#8220;To reformat your hard drive&#8230;.&#8221; However, when I watched how an actual person used my online help file, I noticed he didn&#8217;t use gerunds in his searches. He typed his search like ... <a href="http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/02/11/are-gerunds-in-topic-titles-problematic-in-search-results/">more &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been accustomed to writing topic titles as gerunds (for example, &#8220;Configuring the Monitor Display&#8221; or &#8220;Reformatting Your Hard Drive&#8221;), followed by specific steps that would begin, &#8220;To configure the monitor display&#8230;,&#8221; or &#8220;To reformat your hard drive&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, when I watched how an actual person used my online help file, I noticed he didn&#8217;t use gerunds in his searches. He typed his search like this: <em>configure monitor display</em>, or <em>reformat hard drive</em>.</p>
<p>When I search on Google, I also do the same: I use the form of the verb that expresses the action I want to do. I&#8217;m not looking to &#8220;reformatting my hard drive.&#8221; I want to &#8220;reformat hard drive.&#8221; I want to &#8220;configure monitor display.&#8221; I want to do something, to perform an action.</p>
<p>Grammatically, I think the gerund is more common. But given that the topic title plays a huge role in the search results, I&#8217;m thinking of saying goodbye to gerunds in topic titles. When the user searches for &#8220;reformat hard drive&#8221; the answer will more readily surface if that&#8217;s how I&#8217;ve named the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/02/11/are-gerunds-in-topic-titles-problematic-in-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

